Webinar on “Managing Nutrient Solutions for Hydroponic Leafy Greens and Herbs”

If you missed the e-GRO webinar “Managing Nutrient Solutions for Hydroponic Leafy Greens and Herbs” on Jan. 22, 2016, which was sponsored by Hort Americas, you can still view the webinar on YouTube.

Hydroponic greens and herbs are produced in systems with recirculating nutrient solutions. In order to maintain productive and quality crops, it is important to know how to properly maintain the nutrient solutions. Dr. Chris Currey at Iowa State University and Dr. Neil Mattson at Cornell University discuss strategies for managing pH and EC, formulating nutrient solutions and identifying common nutrient disorders.

Part 1: Common production systems, pH and EC management

Presented by Dr. Chris Currey, Iowa State University


 

Part 2: Nutrient solution recipes, common nutrient disorders

Present by Dr. Neil Mattson, Cornell University

Daily light integral: a better way to measure greenhouse light

Measuring daily light integral (DLI) provides a more
accurate reading of the amount of photosynthetic light being received by
plants.

By David Kuack

Do you measure the light in your greenhouse to ensure
your plants are receiving an adequate amount of light? If you are using a
footcandle meter to measure the light intensity you are not getting a true
measurement of the amount of light received by the plants. Measuring the light
in footcandles or micromoles per square meter per second (µmol/m2/s) is
a measurement of instantaneous light, that is, the amount of light at the time
the measurement is made. An instantaneous measurement made under sunny or cloudy
conditions may not provide an accurate evaluation of the total amount of light
perceived by the plants over the course of a day.

“When you think about light over the course of a day,
light is extremely dynamic,” said assistant horticulture professor Chris Currey
at Iowa State University. “From sunrise to sundown, there are variations in
light. If growers take a single light measurement early in the day, they may be
underestimating the amount of light. Alternatively, if the light measurement is
made later in the day, growers may be overestimating the light level.
Instantaneous light levels change over the course of a day.”
Visible light vs.
photosynthetic light

Currey said another issue with measuring light with a
footcandle meter is that it measures the light that is visible to the human
eye.

“The sun produces a broad spectrum of light,” he said.
“Photosynthetic light, which is the light plants can use for photosynthesis and
is defined as photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), is the light that
occurs between 400 and 700 nanometers. So if a footcandle meter measures light
that is visible to the human eye, this includes wavelengths outside of PAR.
Consequently, footcandle measurements tend to overestimate the amount of light
for plant growth.”
More accurate
measurement

Currey said it is the total amount of photosynthetic
light that is going to impact how a greenhouse crop is going to grow.

“Daily light integral (DLI) is the sum of photosynthetic
light over the course of a day,” he said. “In production situations where there
is a static light source it is relatively easy to determine the DLI. Examples
of a grower producing a crop under a static source of light include growing
plants under high pressure sodium lamps in a warehouse or tissue culture plantlets
grown under LED lights in a laboratory. In these situations the light levels
are not going to change throughout the day.
“In most greenhouse environments light levels change
throughout the day. So to take one instantaneous measurement to indicate the light
level isn’t the best way to describe the total amount of PAR light available.
It’s better to look at the total amount, which is the DLI.”
Currey said a grower could estimate the DLI by using
hourly measurements.
“A grower could go out into the greenhouse every hour and
measure the light intensity,” he said. The grower would then use these
measurements in some calculations that would give the DLI. Realistically, very
few growers are going to determine DLI this way.”
There are a number of instruments available for measuring
DLI. Currey said one of the best ways to determine DLI is to use a quantum
sensor that measures PAR. The unit of measurement for DLI is moles per square
meter per day (mol/m2/day).
“In many cases the quantum sensor is connected to a data
logger that records the light measurements,” he said. “The quantum sensor can
be attached to a data logger that can record frequent instantaneous light
measurements which can then be integrated into a cumulative total for the day.
The quantum sensor can also be hooked up to a greenhouse environmental control
computer, such as an Argus or Priva, which can calculate the DLI.”
Expanding use of
DLI

Researchers at Clemson University used light measurements
collected by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration to developed
monthly DLI maps for the United States.



Monthly daily light integral maps for the United States
were developed using light measurements collected by
the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration. The
 maps are based on historical averages.
Photo courtesy of Michigan State University
Currey said the maps are based on historical averages.
“The DLI maps give you a good average,” he said.
“Poinsettia growers will tell you each growing season is different. Sometimes
they will have bright, sunny Novembers and other years, it’s dark and cloudy.
These maps provide a good indication of light levels, but there are going to be
variations between years. That’s why it is important for growers to measure DLI
so they know what is happening in their greenhouses and be able to react,
including using supplemental lighting to increase DLI.”
Currey said that research has been done to quantify the
DLI necessary for specific crops.
“The optimum DLI is going to vary for different crops,”
he said. “For African violets, a DLI of 6 mol/m2/day is enough to
produce a good crop. For poinsettias, 10-12 mol/m2/day are needed to
grow an acceptable quality crop. For cut roses, the DLI needs to be above 20
mol/m2/day to produce a good crop.”
Growers are using daily light integral with their environmental
controls and supplemental lighting to provide their plants
with optimum photosynthetically active radiation levels.

Currey said some growers are using DLI, their
environmental controls and supplemental lighting to provide their plants with optimum
PAR levels.

“It is kind of like predictive lighting,” he said.
“Growers have their lights turn on when the light intensity is below a certain
level and turn off when the light goes above a certain level. This way a grower
is not adding light during the brightest time of the day when the light level
is at or above the light saturation point for photosynthesis. Growers can use
lighting set points so that if they are not achieving the target DLI for a
crop, they can have the lights turn on sooner or turn off later to ensure
plants receive enough PAR. As a crop goes later into the spring, a grower is
likely going to lower that trigger light intensity because there is going to be
more natural sunlight so less supplement light is needed.”

For more: Christopher
Currey, Iowa State University, Department of Horticulture; (515) 294-1917; ccurrey@iastate.edu.

David Kuack is a freelance technical writer in Fort
Worth, Texas; dkuack@gmail.

Visit our corporate website at https://hortamericas.com

Improving Greenhouse Production with LED Lights

U.S. researchers are looking at the potential benefits to
the propagation and production of greenhouse ornamental and vegetable crops
using LED lights.

By David Kuack
Although U.S. researchers have started studying the
effects of LED lights on the production of greenhouse ornamental and vegetable
crops, much of the data being used by American growers comes from studies done
in Europe. Purdue University horticulture professor Cary Mitchell said that studies
currently being done in the United States will provide growers with information
that is relevant to their production and climatic conditions.
Mitchell is leading a team of university researchers who
have received a $4.9 million grant, including $2.4 million from USDA, to study
LED lighting for greenhouse applications. Mitchell along with Purdue
horticulture professor Roberto Lopez is working with scientists and engineers at
the University of Arizona, Michigan State University, Rutgers University and
Orbital Technologies Corp. Mitchell is working with graduate student Celina
Gomez to study the impact of LED lights on the propagation and production of
high-wire tomatoes. Lopez and graduate students Christopher
Currey and Michael Ortiz are studying the use of LED lights on bedding plant
cuttings and plugs.
Propagation trials
Due to limited greenhouse research space, Gomez is using
one bench to compare the effect of providing supplemental light from a high
intensity discharge lamp or from LED lights with control plants that receive
only natural daylight. During the first year of the propagation study, Gomez is
conducting an experiment every month. The experiment includes a control group
of tomato seedlings that receive no supplemental light, an overhead HID lamp
that provides the industry standard and overhead LED arrays that provide three
different ratios of red to blue light.
“The propagation experiment is repeated for three weeks
every month,” Mitchell said. “We are measuring the differences in plant growth
from one month to the next. As we enter spring, the ambient light levels are
increasing. Gomez will measure the daily light integral (DLI) that is occurring
and the different red/blue ratios and what the plants prefer and determine what
they need. In addition to the plant metrics being collected, we are also
measuring the amount of electricity used for supplemental lighting.”
After the tomato seedlings reach the stage at which they
would be grafted onto the rootstock, data is being collected including plant
dry weight, height, stem diameter, leaf span and leaf area.
Mitchell said the propagation area that is equipped with
the lights receives 5 moles per square meter per day of supplemental light in
addition to the natural solar daily light integral that varies throughout the
year.
“Since we have only done the experiment a couple of times
so far this year, we’ve yet to see what kind of plant response pattern emerges,”
he said. The supplemental light we are providing now might not be enough light
during the dead of winter. Any benefits of supplemental light that occur during
the winter should disappear as the trials move later into spring. Once we have
obtained a full year profile of seedling response, we will be able to determine
the optimum amount of supplemental light to apply each month.
“One of the best management practices that we hope comes
of this long term study is to determine at what point it is important to use
supplemental lighting, as well as when it is no longer useful to do so.”
For the propagation study the tomato seedlings are
receiving supplemental light for 23 hours a day in order to achieve a daily
light integral of 5 moles per square meter per day.
Tomato seeds are being germinated in a substrate called
steadyGROWpro plugs. Six different tomato varieties are being tested: ‘Success’,
‘Komeett’, ‘Maxifort’, ‘Sheva-sheva’, ‘Liberty’ and ‘Felicity’. Seedlings of ‘Success’
and ‘Komeett’ are used for the production study after being grafted onto ‘Maxifort’.
These varieties were recommended by Marco de Bruin at Bushel Boy Farms in Owatonna, Minn., because they have
different growth habits.

Production trials
In the production experiments the grafted seedlings are
being transplanted into Coco Agro coir slabs.
“The lighting treatments containing both test cultivars
are blocked into separate half rows in order to determine if there are position
effects within the greenhouse that could affect yields,” Mitchell said.
The plants are being provided with supplemental light
twice a day. He said they are applying a daily light integral of 9 moles per
square meter per day.
“In early March we were lighting for 12 hours per day,”
Mitchell said. “Lighting usually starts well before sunrise and begins again
before the sun goes down.”
The first production study in 2012 began at the end of
January. Mitchell said the tomato plants that had received supplemental light
treatments were already setting fruit in early March.
“The control plants that didn’t receive any supplemental
light were way behind,” he said. “They were barely setting fruit. That’s what
you would expect in a cloudy region like Indiana.”
The first production experiment of 2012 will be
terminated after six months and a second will begin immediately. Mitchell said
the second experiment will be the exact opposite of the first in terms of solar
daily light integral changes.
“We want to see what challenges there are both with the
propagation and the production starting in the summer and going into the winter,”
he said. “If production is started in the greenhouse in July, the plants are
going to be receiving a lot of sunlight. As the photoperiod starts to shorten going
into fall that is when supplemental lighting will be more valuable.
“We are hoping to come up with recommendations for
growers in this region or in any other northern region that has cloudy weather regarding
when is the best time to start lighting their crops. We are also looking at
timing the production so that growers are not competing with home-grown or
field-grown tomatoes. That way the greenhouse growers are not competing with
availability and price for what’s being grown in backyards or in the field.”

Priming the ornamentals
propagation pump
Purdue horticulture professor
Roberto Lopez and graduate students Christopher Currey and Michael Ortiz are
studying the effect of supplemental light on the propagation of ornamental
vegetative cuttings and plugs.
“We’re looking at the top three
flowering crops that are produced from vegetative cuttings, which are
geraniums, petunias and New Guinea impatiens,” Lopez said. Currey and Ortiz are
comparing rooting, dry mass accumulation and other quality parameters under red
and blue LED lights to high pressure sodium lamps. Initial trials with cuttings
have shown that there are not a lot differences in terms of rooting time and
quality between the two light sources. Additionally, preliminary data is
showing no differences in the time to flower or quality of cuttings propagated
under the various LED lights and high pressure sodium lamps for the three
annual crops.
“Initially, the results
are very similar for
both rooted cuttings and finished plants,” Lopez said. “But this is very
preliminary. There were really no differences seen for these three crops. What
we were mainly trying to achieve was a certain daily light integral with both
the high pressure sodium and red and blue LEDs. With the additional trials that
we will be doing we will also be looking to quantify the amount of electricity
used by the high pressure sodium lights and the LEDs.”
Best timing,
amount of light
Lopez said none of the vegetative cuttings received
supplemental light during the first seven days of propagation because that is
when the cuttings are forming callus.
“A grower typically wouldn’t use lights during this
period unless the light level was really low,” he said. “During that period the
grower is trying to baby the cuttings to get them to form callus. If the light
level is too high during this period the cuttings could be stressed. After a
week the cuttings begin to form roots and start to photosynthesize. A grower
can maximize photosynthesis during rooting by increasing the daily light integral.”
Currey’s research and studies
Lopez performed at Michigan State University indicate growers should
provide a daily light integral of between 8-10 moles per square meter
per day to be able to increase rooting and the overall quality of the cutting.
Lopez and Ortiz are also
testing LED lights during plug propagation of celosia, cosmos, impatiens,
geranium, marigold, pansy and petunia.
“One of the biggest challenges with
plug production of annual bedding plants is keeping the plugs compact,” Ortiz
said. “Compact plugs ease transport in boxes and allow for a higher volume of
plugs to be transported at one time. This is definitely something to consider
as fuel prices continue to rise.
“Plugs are often grown in dense
288- or 504-cell trays that promote rapid stem elongation. We are using red and
far red LEDs in end-of-day treatments in an attempt to manipulate the
phytochrome-mediated genes that are responsible for stem elongation under dense
planting conditions. If LEDs can be used to control seedling height, the
industry can decrease its reliance on plant growth regulators.”
Lopez and Ortiz are also
investigating red and blue LEDs as a supplemental lighting source during winter
bedding plant plug production.
“The goal behind this
experiment is to quantify root development under different ratios of red and
blue LED light and high pressure sodium light,” Ortiz said. “We also are also
trying to determine if supplemental light from LEDs can offer more rapid root
development than light from high pressure sodium lamps. This can make a big
impact on energy use in the industry.”
Lopez said producing cuttings is much different than producing
plugs.
“With plugs a grower is starting out with plants that
have roots,” Lopez said. “A grower may end up being able to delay the sowing of
the plugs if he is using lights. We may find that the LEDs might prove to be
even more beneficial with plugs than with cuttings.”
For more: Cary Mitchell, Purdue
University, Department: Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, (765) 494-1347;
cmitchel@purdue.edu.
Roberto Lopez, Purdue University, Department of Horticulture
and Landscape Architecture, (765) 496-3425; rglopez@purdue.edu;

Visit our corporate website at https://hortamericas.com